A multiple choice test was
always a love/hate thing for me. I loved it because I only had to
have a general knowledge of the subject to have a good chance of
getting the right answer and I hated it because a lot of the time
the answers were so much a like that one word could make it right
or wrong. Then there was always that stinger at the end... either
D or E that stated "none of the above".
Here we are in an election year and at this point we really don’t
know who will be the final choices to be the next president of
these United States. We could wind up with three or even four on
the final choice list to pick from.
One of the things that all of them want to do is to make a change.
That little phrase has been the core of every candidate since
Webster put the word in his dictionary. They tell us that if we
make a change that everything is going to be rosy for the next
four years and that all our problems will be solved because they
are going up there to Washington, DC and cause a big change.
What we haven’t heard from any of the candidates is their goals
and their purpose for their making change. Now don’t get me wrong.
I am all for making changes in Washington and if you have a couple
of hours I could expound on them but for now I will just say we do
need change. We, however, more than change, need direction and
purpose. The person who can promise to deliver those types of
changes can almost be guaranteed a landslide victory come
November.
In any part of this great country at any one time, someone
somewhere can come up with an idea of how to make a million
dollars. If he wants the backing he needs to achieve that goal he
must submit a very detailed business plan. A plan that will spell
out the objectives of the venture and the ultimate goal. In it he
or she will spell out the plan in such a way as to show how much
it will cost and how many people will be involved in achieving the
success of the plan.
Why do we not demand and expect our elected officials to do the
same thing? To simply declare that we need change and not have any
specifics is just spouting empty words. To expound on one party’s
view and to say that one is the right one is not making changes to
benefit the country. It is simply saying "we want to make a change
so we control what transpires in Washington for the next term of
office".
We don’t need change if it doesn’t benefit the citizens. We don’t
need change if it doesn’t set new goals and purpose to our nation.
Anyone can come in and create changes in tax and spend programs.
Everyone who has gone to Washington has declared making changes,
only to fall into that same old, same old, rut that has been the
rule in Washington since World War ll.
What we really need are candidates that purpose direction for the
country that will solve the problems of this nation instead of
adding to those we already have. We need candidates that can
clearly state that what they purpose to do will have a positive
impact on the nation. We need a candidate that jumps out on the
page when we enter the ballot booth. One that will give us a
business plan for our government and then carry it out once he or
she takes the helm in the White house.
Other wise we should add that D or E to the ballot and simply vote
"none of the above".
|