Why in the world have so many
presidents , especially modern ones, chosen such mediocre (I use
this word out of kindness) vice presidents? I believe it may be
insurance against assassination. No matter what we may think of
Obama, who wants Joe Biden for president? His penchant for
foot-in-mouth disease even embarrasses Democrats. Remember the time
he was in the Democratic presidential primary and dropped out
because was caught plagiarizing a minor British politician? The
doofus could at least have plagiarized a more eloquent
countryman...say, William Shakespeare. The general public is so dumb
it wouldn't have known the difference. G. W. Bush's choice wasn't a
dummy but was so scary even Hillary Clinton made a rare (very rare)
humorous quip, referring to Dick Cheney as Darth Vader. Bush himself
provided the comedy in that administration with his hilarious
malapropisms. Then there was Dan Quail. Let's be nice and let Dan
live in peace. Fox News tried to resurrect him as a political pundit
but that experiment didn't last long. Let's go no farther back than
John F. Kennedy, the last (hopefully the really last) president to
be assassinated. His death gave us Lyndon Johnson and his
Not-so-great Society. Did you know that in 1984 ,eleven years after
his death, a Texas county grand jury indicted Johnson on nine counts
of co-conspiracy to commit murder? But I don't have enough space to
recount Johnson's misdeeds. The answer to all this? I think we
should elect the president and vice president separately, as
Virginia does its governor and lieutenant governor. After all, the
vice president has nothing to do except preside over the senate and
occasionally cast a tie-breaker vote. Plus attend funerals. What a
plush job! And in case something happens to the big boss, he gets
the chair in the oval office! |